Events Calendar

2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch

Eat Here - Gulf Coast Cookery Right column ad Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you think the labrador mix Padi, who bit and injured a child while the dog was allegedly protecting himself, should be euthanized?

 Yes  No More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Opinion

Does the Truth Even Matter Anymore?

Published Sunday, June 1, 2014 12:10 am

When I'm out and about, I'm often hit with complaints about the media in general, its various actual or perceived biases and how often we seem to get the facts wrong. There's certainly some fairness in such criticism and far more often than I'd like to admit, I wind up embarrassed by things that occur in my industry.

Much of the problem revolves around shrinking newsrooms and investigative resources, compounded by an expectation that editors produce more copy from less people, who are themselves charged with a host of additional responsibilities from editing their own copy to promoting their work via social media outlets.

The digital wind tunnel has also created a seismic shift in the way news is produced. Once upon a time, news outlets would use their platform to drive the narrative – to investigate, explore and expound on issues it deems most critical to informing its readership. Increasingly, they are responding to that echo chamber; monitoring trending topics on search engines and sites like Twitter and then creating the news that the target readership has already anointed important.

That's a monumental about-face in the way we think about news and a classic case of the tail wagging the dog. But it's not just the subject that news outlets tend to chase, it's also the perspective. Increasingly, readers and viewers can expect to have their own biases confirmed by simply tuning into an outlet that will reliably present a certain, predictable narrative.

That narrative is then reinforced by layers and layers of sub-sources, each one with less accountability than the one above it. Quite frequently, I receive forwarded emails from readers who claim to have discovered damning evidence that has been being hidden from them by the evil and biased media.

Why won't the media cover this? I am asked countless times each week. Almost without exception, the answer is the same: Dear sir or ma'am, because it's not true. Here are some links to sources which will demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that what you've presented as news, in fact hasn't happened. Thank you for reading.

Their response is also almost always the same; an ardent defense of the position they had along with the implication that, regardless of the facts, the essence of the argument is beyond reproach. Essentially: it doesn’t really matter if the information I sent you is factual, because my position is sound.


Last October, Fox News personality Sean Hannity ran a show on “the stories that the media refuses to cover” regarding "Obamacare." Predictably, Hannity's guests told their horror stories of canceled policies, premium hikes, doctor restrictions, financial burdens on their small businesses, etc.

This was everything Hannity's audience came to hear. It turned out that pretty much all of the claims were fabricated and that the "news" show apparently did no vetting of their guests once they determined that they were going to bash the law.

One after another, guests on other shows were shown to be making up their claims, in most cases never having even gone onto the ACA website to shop policies. Many were even shown to have been eligible for cheaper and better coverage through the exchange.

Of course, there was no viewer backlash, no price to be paid for, at worst, deliberately misleading them and, at best, being guilty of shoddy, sub-amateur journalism. It didn't cost ratings, because to most of the viewers, it really didn't matter. They'd decided that the ACA – ironically, based on a conservative invention supported by everyone from Newt Gingrich to the Heritage Foundation – was an evil socialist plot.

If a particular claim didn't hold water, it only mattered that it expressed the correct sentiment. I'm sorry, but it's hard not to ask how much blame the viewers (on both sides) need to carry. If they create an enormous market for propaganda, someone is going to fill it.


There's plenty of real debate to have over the Affordable Care Act to be sure. There are several genuine aspects that one might be critical of, and there would be value in creating a platform to have thoughtful debate on a news program. But why do that, if you can just tailor fictional arguments that better serve your position, especially when the reality is much more complicated and the problems often involve placating special interests (insurance companies for Democrats and providers for Republicans) you don't want to offend because they buy both advertising and political influence?


Obviously, it's much easier to create a fictional movie than to compile a documentary, especially if you want it to be politically titillating. But we seem to have reached a point where viewers/readers are willfully accepting fiction as a substitute reality so long as the underlying premise suits them. The fact that they cannot see that both sides are holding special interests above that of their constituents is frightening, and when I see everyday people, who are by and large screwed on a regular basis by the system their tax dollars fund, nonetheless carrying the water for these straw man arguments, it's clear that it's working.

I'm not excusing their lack of integrity, but it's no wonder that highly-competitive media outlets fighting for a shrinking pool of paid advertisement are delivering the product that so many news consumers want – one that will tell them their side is right all day long. More than ever before, that consumer can have their own views reinforced by what is at least presented as a credible source. They can look, listen and read all day long and never have to hear a view they don't share, creating an even more skewed perception that their position is not only valid, but that a majority of Americans share it, but are being somehow silenced.

Increasingly, the truth-be-damned dynamic has bled into politics to the point that even when one side is pointing out that another fibbed, it often cannot pass up the opportunity to tell a lie of its own. A recent analysis showed that the overwhelming amount of campaign advertising associated with groups funded by the right-wing Koch brothers tended to be non-factual (to put it mildly), but so did the Democratic responses to them.

So one side tells a bald-faced lie and understandably, the other side wants to leverage that to impress their dishonesty on undecided voters. But rather than let the lie speak for itself in pointing it out, the aggrieved create a fake narrative of their own to denounce it.

When confronted, the response is almost always the same: something to the effect of, okay, maybe we weren't completely accurate in the way we said that, but this group is still evil, and we're the good guys here, so at the end of the day there was no harm done because the part about you should vote them out of office stands. Meanwhile, the reason the groups put out so much advertising laced with false claims is because there is an audience that doesn't really care whether the ads are factual, so long as they purport to confirm their biases about the other side.

This is a dangerous way of thinking, as it perpetuates the idea that one side is always right, merely because their intentions are more pure and their ideology more sound. Any means to accomplishing their desired ends are therefore inherently justified. We used to be a better country than that, one where truth was not only important but essential, and we remained wary of ideologues even when they were on our side of the aisle.


Dennis Maley's column appears every Thursday and Sunday in The Bradenton Times. He can be reached at Click here to visit his column archive. Click here to go to his bio page. You can also follow Dennis on Facebook.

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.


  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below

Non-Facebook Comments:

What is most chilling to me is that Fox News is openly and actively seeking to discredit all other news sources. It encourages its audience to dismiss all other media not agreeing with the Fox News views - labeling them as ?the liberally biased media?. Fox created the label ?liberally biased media?.

Fox does itself no favor by hiring conservative ?icons? such as Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, etc. whose journalistic credentials and credibility are minimal, and who have obvious right wing political bias. Fox reporters and anchors do not deliver objective news, only news with a right wing spin, opinions,right wing political propaganda; but then Fox is catering to their audience. Rational thinkers avoid Fox cable news ? except to check on what the latest ?invention of scandal? they are

I am not sure who said it, "A chicken with only one wing flies in circles." Our country needs both wings and much more honest compromise from both sides, with a good dose of common sense.
Posted by Sandra J. Gander on June 1, 2014

News reporting, and even Journalism has gone from the dissemination of evidence based information, to entertainment. The industry itself made this decision decades ago. News reporting on TV was done at a business loss, but now it is a profit center, like blockbuster movies are....Freedom of the Press is not only a "right" it is a responsibility. This democracy cannot stand without it. I suggest we are surrendering our American Exceptionalism to other democracies in the world. As citizens we allow this at our own peril....
Posted by Dr. Joseph J Amato on June 1, 2014

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page

 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!

News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate


Name Date
Edith Deacy August 1, 2015
Richard Shore, III July 29, 2015
Lisa Casper July 30, 2015
Nancy Rowe July 25, 2015
Irene Brothers July 24, 2015
Allene O'Brien June 23, 2015
Dorothy Hill July 28 2015
David Maberry July 24, 2015
Juanita Floyd June 26, 2015
All Obituaries

Copyright © 2009 - 2015 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper |
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates