Events Calendar

SMTWTFS
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: The U.S. Senate has voted against the Keystone XL Pipeline. Is this good news or bad news?

 Good news  Bad news More polls »



Home
Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: National Government



Supreme Court Scraps Overall Campaign Contribution Caps

Published Friday, April 4, 2014 12:06 am

BRADENTON – In the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court has struck down overall limits on campaign contributions, leaving in place only a cap on donations to a single candidate. In a 5-4 vote on Wednesday, the court ruled that individuals have a right to give the legal maximum to Congressional and Presidential candidates, as well as to parties and PACs, without worrying that they will violate the law if they go over a limit on all contributions, set at $123,200, which includes a separate $48,600 cap on contributions to candidates. The decision does not impact the $2,600 limits on individual contributions to candidates for President or Congress.

https://www.thebradentontimes.com/clientuploads/Washington/USSupremeCourt.JPG

Chief Justice John Roberts announced the decision, a split vote between the court's liberal and conservative justices. Roberts said the total limits do not act to prevent corruption, as the court had previously upheld as justification for contribution caps, saying they "intrude without justification on a citizen's ability to exercise `the most fundamental First Amendment activities'," a quote from the court's 1976 ruling in Buckley v. Valeo.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately, saying he would have gone even further and wiped away all contribution limits.

Congress enacted the limits as a response to Watergate-era abuses, as a way to restore public confidence in the campaign finance system. However, the Roberts Court has struck down provisions of federal law aimed at limiting the influence of big donors in a series of recent rulings that decided they were unconstitutional limits on free speech.

 

The most famous of those rulings was 2010's Citizens United case (also 5-4), which ruled that corporations were protected as people under the Constitution and could spend as much as they wanted to on campaigning, provided it is independent of individual candidates' campaigns (Political Action Committees cannot "coordinate" with the official campaign of a candidate).

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.

 

  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below



Non-Facebook Comments:

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page




 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!



News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate
 

MidTown Manatee - Shop here - Work here - Play Here - Live Here - Worship Here - Dine Here

Obituaries

Name Date
Eleanor Eason November 17, 2014
Dan Taylor November 16, 2014
Jacklin Suggs November 16, 2014
Frederick Seiden November 14, 2014
Lynn Miles November 13, 2014
Gloria Sells November 6, 2014
Jean Claude Presendieu October 30, 2014
Sylvester McCollough November 4, 2014
Holly Frost November 12, 2014
All Obituaries






Copyright © 2009 - 2014 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper | http://www.thebradentontimes.com/
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates