Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


ELC - VPK Enrollment Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you think the Obama Administration has generally been truthful with the American people regarding crises like Benghazi, the IRS targeting scandal and seizing AP phone records?

 Yes  About as much About as I'd expect any administration to be  No More polls »

The Village of The Arts Magazine Red Barn - More than a Flea Market

Home
Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Local Government



BOCC Votes for Tax Abatement Referendum

Published Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:00 pm

BRADENTON -- At Tuesday's BOCC meeting, commissioners approved to adopt Resolution R-13-052, an ad valorem tax exemption referendum to be placed on the ballet in a special election to be held on June 18, 2013. Supporters say it is another apparatus for their economic tool box, which will bring development investment. Opponents call it a public gamble that, too often, does not pay off.

 

In August of 2012, the Board of County Commissioners voted to approve Resolution R-12-159 authorizing referendum language to be placed on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot for an ad valorem tax exemption. But the board then withdrew the request on August 21, 2012, citing insufficient time for public understanding and input. 

 

Sharon Hillstrom, President and CEO of the Bradenton Area Economic Development Corporation returned to the commission Tuesday, saying the public and the business community were now ready and waiting to go forward with the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption (EDATE). 

 

Hillstrom says, "We are the hole in the donut," adding, "We are surrounded by counties that offer tax abatements and we don't know what economic activity we are missing," a theme she repeated many times through her presentation.

 

EDATE will now most likely be placed on the June 18 ballot, along side the half-cent sales tax increase, also approved Tuesday for referendum. 

 

clientuploads/County_Commission/DiSabatino_Portrait.jpg
            Commissioner DiSabatino

A long string of questions came from Commissioner Robin DiSabatino, who wasn't completely convinced this was the right tool for the county. "What happens when someone else comes along with a similar proposal, we are obligated to give them the same deal," said DiSabatino. "It's arbitrary ... It's not spelled out."

 

County Administrator Ed Hunzeker said, "We left it open, so that it goes before the board." DiSabatino wasn't convinced, asking, "What qualifies as new? How much is it, 50 percent, 100 percent and for how long?"

 

Hunzeker said it was set up to go before the board each time a company applied, and that such parameters would be decided at that time, on a case by case basis. 

 

Hillstrom said some business would come from Enterprise Florida (the state's economic development corporation), and that the advertised tax abatement would bring more investment to the county, saying, "There have been recent calls asking if we have a tax abatement program."

 

John Barnott, Director of Building and Development Services for Manatee County, had come down from his office to address the commission on Hillstrom's behalf, "I am on the Board of the Lakewood Ranch Business Alliance," said Barnott, "and I will say some very large interests have been inquiring." Barnott started to walk away and turned back to add, "some very large interests."

 

DiSabatino's skepticism is not without merit. Many of the surrounding counties that Hillstrom referred to have experienced public/private deals that have gone belly-up at great cost to the public. Barnott spoke again, saying, "There is nothing to lose, if there was nothing there to start with."

 

Opponents argue that there are too many large buildings that sit vacant, because some company was attracted to the pile of free-bees, instead of sound, well-funded investments. Others complain that many of the giveaways go to businesses for things they would have done anyway and can create an uneven playing field for competitors who don't secure the breaks.

 

The discussion finally went to a vote after promises to scrutinize each for job creation and market placement. The measure was approved unanimously.



Comments:


How soon Manatee County forgets what happened to Sarasota County with abatements/handouts! Sanborn studios and others have bilked Sarasota out of millions of dollars with no job creation.

Wake up Manatee. We need jobs, but not at taxpayer expense.
Posted by Barbara Angelucci on March 14, 2013
 

agenda 21 is more alive and well every day that arrives,most all of these pump and dumps that are looking for free money, fact is it's a long way from free, the Robin Hoods are upside down helping themselves to taxpayers money, promoting corparate wefare at its max.
at least 99 % failure rate in Hardee, the only jobs being created are covernment investigation agencies, and hopefully law enforcement soon, the only requirements are that tip money is tip money in pockets. not taxpayer pockets
Posted by frank kirkland on March 14, 2013
 

It appears that this proposal could use more vetting. Further it seems does seem arbitrary as DiSabatino states...picking and choosing on what basis who gets 50% or 100%? Good job Mr. Rehill.
Posted by norma killebrew on March 13, 2013
 

Click here to add a comment to this page


Site Search


Manatee Rural Health Certificate

Menu

 


Obituaries

Name Date
John ''Jack'' P. Clark May 16, 2013
Julia Rothery May 16, 2013
Donald Kissel May 17, 2013
Rose F. Leonard May 13, 2013
Jacqualine Nelson May 12, 2013
Regana Galloway April 29, 2013
Gary Melvin Littley May 9, 2013
John Reichl May 8, 2013
David Tippett May 6, 2013
All Obituaries



Free xml sitemap generator