Events Calendar

SMTWTFS
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


Eat Here - Gulf Coast Cookery Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: How will you be cooking your Thanksgiving turkey?

 Oven-roasting  In a slow-cooker or crock-pot  Deep-frying it! More polls »



Home
Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Opinion



Low Wages are the Enemy of a Strong Domestic Economy

Published Sunday, February 24, 2013 12:10 am
clientuploads/Dennis/Dennis_Maley.jpg

President Obama's push to hike the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour has renewed debate about the role of regulation when it comes to human capital in an economy. Companies clearly want to pay as little as the market for labor will allow; however, there is no denying that a variety of factors have conspired to see that the wages of most workers have been flat for going on a half century, or that it's been bad for our economy as a whole.

In terms of market dynamics, two major forces have put downward pressure on American wages: outsourcing and automation. Relaxed trade regulations in the era of globalization have encouraged many American companies to move factories overseas where the cost and standard of living is much lower and pollution standards are nearly nonexistent. High-speed internet has compounded that dynamic by providing low-cost video and telephone services, which opened the floodgate for occupations in fields like customer service and consulting to also be off-shored, when they were previously thought to be immune.


Meanwhile, rapidly-changing technology has continued to allow companies to replace more and more positions with robotics, especially on the low end of the economic spectrum. Economic theory had long held that technology could only open up more opportunities, as jobs lost were quickly replaced by new ones, when companies invested such savings in growth. But today, $1.3 trillion in cash sits idle among corporations, while unemployment remains near historic highs. 


More Americans than ever are living below the federal poverty line. Toll booths continue to shed human operators for cameras and computers, retail stores continue to offer more self-checkout lanes and the crunch on public sector budgets have forced many agencies to do the same work with less people. American companies continue to enjoy record profits, while investing much of the money that isn't idle in foreign markets. Meanwhile, the wealth gap grows and more Americans than ever are forced onto an already overburdened social safety net.

This isn't the first time that changes in markets and technologies have resulted in an economy which was healthy at the top, while still failing to provide adequate opportunities for enough citizens to earn a living wage. In fact, it's been rather typical. The difference is the mechanisms that are put in place to help bring at least a dose of humanity to the imbalances that naturally accompany growth in unfettered capitalism.

During the gilded age, we pretty much took the notion that as long as the alternative was starving in the streets, people would work under any circumstances offered and at any wage. This kept the cost of labor low, but also hampered demand. America experienced its greatest prosperity during an era in which the working class had won its most equitable arrangement. 40-hour work weeks, costly overtime and reasonable retirements all helped to keep more people employed, as the work was spread out. 

 

What has changed most in the modern economy is a drastic increase in capacity. We can make far more of everything with far fewer workers. This has driven up profits, but because workers have not shared in the fruits of their increased productivity and cannot consume enough of what we are capable of producing, the enormous surplus of production capacity is helping to stymie growth. As a result, we don't have enough consumption capacity, or speaking more plainly, consumers don't have enough disposable income to fuel growth in an economy where 70 percent of GDP comes from us buying things.

 

An economy can get stuck in a trick bag when wages are low and unemployment is high. With excess labor, there's no immediate benefit to individual companies who pay more than they have to. In fact, they're likely to find themselves at a competitive disadvantage. This is where good government can enact policies which move them in a healthy direction all at once, providing an umbrella of protection. But while the governments of any developed economy routinely take steps to help correct market shortfalls, any sort of mechanism deployed to correct wage inequalities tends to spark knee-jerk ideological reactions from many Americans. At the end of the day, we take measures to correct pricing in nearly every market imaginable from milk to electricity, and until we figure out a way to ensure that the new economy provides living-wage job opportunities for more Americans, previous standards of growth will remain unattainable. 

 

Walmart has been mumbling about horrific February numbers just as low-wage workers begin to experience smaller paychecks as a result of expired payroll tax breaks. Unlike the wealthiest Americans, who often stockpile cash or invest it in foreign markets, low-income households tend to spend close to 100 percent of their income on the exact sort of commodities that drive growth. When they get pinched and have to cut back, it loudly reverberates throughout the enitre economy. Conversely, putting more spendable income into their pockets is the fastest way to jumpstart consumption, while also working toward a more humane society and reducing the chances of social strife.

 

President Obama said that no one working a full-time job in the wealthiest nation in the world should live in poverty. He's right, but unfortunately even $9 an hour won't prevent that from being the case. Nonetheless, it's at least a start, and pushing up the bottom will have a ripple effect among low-income workers as $9 an-hour jobs begin to pay $11-12 in order to draw the better skilled labor. Will some companies cut jobs as a result? Perhaps, but the overall effect of millions of low-wage workers getting additional disposable income, nearly all of which will be spent into the economy, will be increased consumption folllowed by sustainable growth. If we can do that and put a dent in the amount of children who go to bed hungry, who could be against it? If corporations are humans, as we've been told is the case, it should be fair to expect that they act humane. Paying at least close to a living wage would be a good start. 

 

Dennis Maley's column appears every Thursday and Sunday in The Bradenton Times. He can be reached at dennis.maley@thebradentontimes.com. Click here to visit his column archive. You can also follow Dennis on Facebook. Sign up for a free email subscription and get The Bradenton Times' Thursday Weekly Recap and Sunday Edition delivered to your email box each week at no cost.

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.

 

  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below



Non-Facebook Comments:


Dennis is right on as usual. I would add that because corporations don't depends as much as they used to on our markets, they don't rely on our middle class to buy their products. That makes them less invested in the viability of the American middle class because they can sell their products in overseas markets because of the growth of middle class in developing countries.

Citizens United, which gave corporations the ability to make contributions to political campaigns, has made it harder for the American public to assert itself with our politicians.

Thanks Dennis an excellent article.
Posted by Janet L. Stanko on February 24, 2013
 

Mandating how much business owners must pay, and how much the individual can sell his labor is unconstitutional, period. Also, small business must lay off the least skilled workers, and the others must pick up the slack. Minimum wage keeps the least skilled out of the work force, and many will never even get a foot in the door. Minimum wage also is a reason so many are paid under the table.
Posted by Peggy Behnke on February 24, 2013
 

I love the "but it will cause inflation" whines from the top 5% and their stooges whenever the idea of more money for poor people comes up. Where were their complaints when *their* incomes shot toward the moon, leaving the rest of America behind?

The thing is, there is no business where direct labor is the entire product cost. Take a prepared food business, and a product we'll call a "booger" selling for $1. 40% is the absolute top labor cost in a poorly-managed fast food place. So the labor cost of making a booger and collecting the $1 is 40 cents. Obviously, raising minimum wage from $7.25/hour to $9/hour is not going to up the cost of making the booger by a whole lot.

Another fun labor cost thing for you to think about: According to most of the industry studies I've read (and I report on the IT industry, so I've read a bunch of them) the labor cost of making an iPhone in China is around $10. Wha wha wha, cry the richies... that labor cost would be four times as much if those phones were made in the states, and that would take money out of the mouths of poor, destitute yacht owners. Wha wha wha.

Whoa, richies and richie apologists. Not so fast. The real, unsubsidized sales price of an iPhone 4S is around $450. Making them here, with American workers, might drive the labor cost up to about $40. On a $450 product. Not excessive, and let me tell you: My fellow Americans can use the work. We can also use the taxes those workers would pay, and rejoice in the amount of government help they won't be needing.

The more Americans we have working, and the more money they earn, the better off we *all* are. Period.
Posted by Robin Miller on February 24, 2013
 

Spoken like a true social democrate, Mr Maley. Perhaps you should read, "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich A. Hayek
Posted by Dick Olson on February 24, 2013
 

The wealthy & big business always cry about how if the minimum wage is increased that it will be a job killer.etc.But jobs are still lost even with the low wages that are paid due to outsourcing to other countries or hiring undocumented workers at home while the management of these business increase their income & profits.The republicans & their friends are always talking about class warfare but they are the one's who fired the first shot along with their wall street cronies.The middleclass workers don't want a welfare state just an equal chance to get ahead & enjoy the so called American dream. The economy always benefits when American workers can afford to buy the products they make.It's a win win situation for both workers & the companies they work for if workers are paid a decent wage
Posted by William E.Moore on February 24, 2013
 

Hey Dennis do you bow down everyday in front of Paul Krugmans picture. The liberal thinking that all people are created equal is typical of people who have never started a business or run one. You feel everyone deserves a minimum wage but not a maximum. I was taught that you work hard and smart you will work your way up into better pay and job security or be like unions where everyone is the same do not work harder than the next guy because you will make them look bad and in the case of unions usually be punished for that. All workers are not created equal and the market will sort them out but to punish the good workers and what they can produce is wrong.When you run a business now and you look at your overall budget for labor who gets hurt when you have to make cuts--the hard worker cannot get a raise because we don't want his pay and benifits to be too much higher than the minimum but the Government will tax and regulate him more because he is trying to become rich or better themselves for their children. And tell your boss what the heck if we are going to get a higher minimum wage why not make it a law that anyone that rents living quarters cannot go over $100.00 a month per family and must pay all the utilities.
Posted by Tom OBrien on February 24, 2013
 

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page




 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!



News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate
 


Obituaries

Name Date
Lee Edington November 21, 2014
June Stowell _
Eleanor Eason November 17, 2014
Dan Taylor November 16, 2014
Jacklin Suggs November 16, 2014
Frederick Seiden November 14, 2014
Lynn Miles November 13, 2014
Gloria Sells November 6, 2014
Jean Claude Presendieu October 30, 2014
All Obituaries






Copyright © 2009 - 2014 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper | http://www.thebradentontimes.com/
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates