Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch

Eat Here - Gulf Coast Cookery Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you think the labrador mix Padi, who bit and injured a child while the dog was allegedly protecting himself, should be euthanized?

 Yes  No More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis Right column ad

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Commentary

Shoes Too Big to be Filled

Published Sunday, November 11, 2012 12:10 am

When the Manatee County Commission convenes on the 27th of this month, it will do so without Commissioner Joe McClash's nameplate on the dais for the first time in 22 years. In McClash, long targeted for removal by developers who did not appreciate his smart growth land use philosophy, the board loses more than a critical voice of dissent. On a commission where four of the seven members were serving their first term, the value of McClash's deep wealth of institutional knowledge had never been so obvious than the last two years.

The county commission is one of the toughest political offices to master. The board covers such a broad swath of public business that there is no private or public sector career field that can even come close to fully preparing a newly-elected official. Once elected, members have two choices: roll up their shirt sleeves and master a daunting array of material, or lean heavily on the expertise of others, trusting both their competence and intentions, though it's hard to imagine that's what the voters who elected them had in mind.
Manatee County Commissioner Joe McClash

I've known Joe for almost three years, which is how long I've been the editor of this publication, which he founded about a year before I came on board with the honest intention of getting more people interested in their local government, while providing deeper and more complete coverage than was available elsewhere for those already paying close attention. The interview for that job never included ideological questions or any sort of litmus test. He'd read my work, so I can only assume he'd been aware that we had some stark philosophical differences. His instructions were pretty simple: tell the truth, quote accurately and spell peoples' names correctly. When we reported the news, we would report it straight and when we provided opinion we would do it with the facts solidly on our side. As long as that was the case, there were no sacred cows.

Joe and I don't often socialize or talk about many things not related to politics. But over the last three years, we have spent countless hours in my office debating issues, disagreeing, proposing solutions and generally playing devil's advocate to each other as we try to imagine feasible solutions to the complicated problems facing our society. Over that time, I've gotten to know him rather well in terms of how he thinks and what guides his decisions. He's often referred to as stubborn, but to me that sounds too pejorative for something that comes from a good place. It might be better said that Commissioner McClash is principled to a fault. He's an honest man with a moral code so ironclad, that my secret nickname for him is the Last Boy Scout. 

In my humble opinion, Joe's greatest strength is his intellectual curiosity. When he takes even a slight interest in something, he invests the time in learning it well, and if it stokes the fire in his belly, he can become almost obsessive in seeking a subject's mastery. He's what they call in sports, a student of the game. This serves him well as a commissioner, because he simply doesn't like to be involved in making decisions if he doesn't fully understand the issue from the perspective of all stakeholders. That discomfort leads him to ask a lot of questions. When he doesn't get answers that make sense to him, he tends to get skeptical, and so he does his homework. After 22 years of this approach to the office, suffice it to say, Commissioner McClash knows his stuff.

Anyone with that sort of tenure would be described as “experienced,” so it's important to make the distinction between time served and expertise gathered. As a result of the tenacity to which he's approached the office, McClash has spent most of his time in service as the most knowledgeable and capable member of the board. Whether it's building roads and bridges, annexing land, developing tourism interest, maintaining facilities or marketing our port, he can speak intelligently and sniff out B.S. when someone tries to slip a fast one. There's also an intangible that accompanies the confidence bred by such studious efforts. Those sort of people tend to be more comfortable admitting when they don't know or understand something, because they lack the defensiveness and insecurity that someone going through the motions often brings to the table. That dynamic will be sorely missed.

An avid boater and fisherman, McClash will finally have

more time to spend on the water.

The board will also lose someone whose pragmatic sense of compromise has become all too rare in modern politics. Like I said, we don't agree on a lot of bedrock philosophical items, but the vast majority of times we arrive at the same conclusion in terms of policy, because common sense tends to trump ideological purity among reasonable men. Joe McClash is what I call a commonsense conservative. He has deeply-held beliefs that are rooted in an ideological mindset, but he's not the kind of guy who cuts off his nose to spite his face – or who starts every debate from the assumption that his position is infallible. When he knows he isn't going to get his way, he's also smart enough to start looking for strategies in which he can avoid walking away from the table empty handed. As a result, many of the fights he's lost have had less dire consequences than had he fought them with an all-or-nothing mindset, and for that, his constituents should be thankful.

Today's county commission, like too many municipal government entities, has become increasingly dominated by politicians – people for whom it seems securing and keeping the office is the end game, rather than the means to effect meaningful change. Closely covering local governments gives you a bird's eye view into the people who serve them. It also presents you with the same choice as a commissioner: come to know the subject matter very well, or lean heavily on what you're told by others. I don't need to tell you that people who work for Joe McClash's outfit don't really have that choice, and when I moved to West Bradenton to oversee a publication that was intensely focused on local government, I knew I had to eat, sleep and drink municipal policy and politics eight days a week since most of my expertise had been in state and national affairs. 

When it comes to the county commission, what I've seen firsthand as both an editor and a taxpayer is a dynamic in which a few members routinely show up with stacks of documentation, having talked to all stakeholders and usually having some valid, well-informed concerns about issues that would otherwise pass without a whisper, while the rest seem to show up knowing much less, but are nevertheless unwavering in their support.

What troubles me, is that the former always seem to be on the losing side these days, while the latter continue to get their way. This raises the very important question of who and what is informing their decisions. The fact that they tend to be the same candidates who are so generously supported by the interests those decisions tend to benefit offers at least one clue. The close relationship they all seem to enjoy with the county administrator might offer another. But in terms of public interest, elected officials are the only ones under any real oversight. Staff and administration are not bound by the same sunshine laws, nor do bureaucrats serve at the pleasure of the citizenry, who cannot vote them in or out of their positions. FishingFam.JPG
At sea with son Sean, daughter Megan and wife Casey

But if you're a mediocre public servant who has spent your time in office attending every rubber chicken dinner, social club meeting, and partisan black tie affair, and still find the more nuanced matters of municipal policy rather complicated and perhaps even boring, what choice do you have but to listen to those who know much more, especially if their ideas are keeping those who support your campaigns happy? This is too often how modern municipal government works. A commissioner or a councilperson or a school board member gets elected at the hands of special interests, votes on their behalf and gets publicly honored for their visionary leadership so often that they begin to believe the nonsensical inscriptions on the plaques that litter their office walls. Eventually there are so many schools and parks and roads dedicated to such people that even they must start to think that it's something more than a trade-out for all of that rubber-stamping.

Joe McClash has never been one for award banquets, or trading his influence for seats on boards and things that could be named after him. Suffice it to say there are no cushy six-figure jobs waiting for his kids in return for him having played the game. A lot his supporters were angered by the way his public service was ended – a hatchet job by the industry he'd fought only to strike a balance between his native community's inevitable growth and development and the maintenance of its charm and wonder – so much so, that nearly 6,000 of them wrote his name on Tuesday's ballot in protest.


But while his grandchildren will never see his name on buildings or a statue of his likeness in a park, they'll know that his service to this community lives on and can be seen in a manner much more fitting his personality than such instruments of vanity. They'll know it when they breathe the clean air he fought to save, walk on the green space he helped to preserve and raise his descendants in a beautiful community that he loved enough to serve so selflessly, without expecting anything in return. For Joe McClash, public service was just that – serving the public – and the way he went about it should be a model for every commissioner yet to come. 

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.


  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below

Non-Facebook Comments:


You will be sorely missed at that dais as well in Manatee County Government in general. I never thought of you as a Republican or any other political party member. To me you will always remain just Joe, my friend.
Posted by Bob Herrington on November 11, 2012

I did not know Joe personally but I as an environmentalist believe that he was one of two on the commission who really care about the people and environment of this community and not about the affluent builders who have bought the commissioners. I have lived in Manatee for 15 years and care greatly about what might happen to our environment.
Posted by Patricia Benson on November 11, 2012

Dennis I plan to send this to our well lobbed bunch of county leaders, as a target they should set their sights on, you have hit the nail dead on wow, what a work of art in exposing the service of a man after my heart, I only was around him in a few meetings, but had a vision of him as you describe, and one day people may look back and say if we only held our politicians to similar standards.
The fact that the goal of most is to hold office as long as possible, only for proposes of control, self serving, cabal serving, and most of all reelection. We watch our local commissioners including the best of them, go into meetings with an over loaded agenda of issues impossible to rightly evaluate in a few minutes with hardly no home work on the issue, in fact the documents are normally not presented till a day or so before the meeting, and the commissioner would not have a clue, or enough gumption to admit the fact and put it on the back burner till they have clarification, the denominator is who is in need of a rubber stamp so they can turn over the dollars, which will help the commissioner buy the next term, and appears to help the commissioners port folio or retirement fund.
We also watch and listen to the agencies that fall under these commissioners thumb, where the biggest part of them are the main problem with America today, these agencies and departments main goal is to see which one can get the most state and federal grants, (They call free money) and dump in the laps of local insiders to launder at will, more often than not going to scam artist praying off the brain dead commissioners and their puppets, and yes the county Managers are main players in most cases, they are the go between the scammers and the money. (I call it upside down Robin Hood Syndrome)
Our experience has only seen a couple people in offices that put the best interest of the constituents at heart and stand against, lobbers influence; they claim the rubber stamps are the best for constituents when fact is, it?s best for lobbers and the Cabals interest.
Our county commissioners have rebelled against constituents to the point of actually imposing gag orders on citizens to stifle comments and questions about mismanagement issues that county staff has yet to show evidence that cleared them of mismanagement allegations from, citizens who have evidence that raises questions, we have one commissioner who stands tall on certain issues, But we don?t see knowledge wisely used to direct voting, it appears they make hasty decisions to keep from earning their pay by working for it, they put the study on the staff, which more often than not favor big money, We see that in Manatee and other counties also.
Posted by Frank Kirkland on November 11, 2012

To lose in a fair primary election wouldn't have been so bad but the way it happened to exclude democrats & independents speaks for itself.Hope Joe will run when his old seat is up for grabs come the next election. Maybe changing the rules to do away with partisan primaries & having just nonpartisan elections for county commission may be an idea for the future, it would be far more fair & save money too.
Posted by William E.Moore on November 11, 2012

Thank you for your service Joe. You did many remarkable things.

Unfortunately you tarnished your reputation in the way you handled the loss. So did Donna Hayes in waging war against her successor. Lombardo switching parties after his loss to a professional--ditto.

The Manatee Republican Party is strong but these behaviors in losing related above do not reflect Republican values.

Please leave with dignity and class.
Posted by Richard Williams on November 11, 2012

This is a sad day for Manatee County. the loss of Joe McClash will be profound. It will take those who fail to understand that loss a very long time to realize the depth of that loss (if they ever figure it out). The county commission is about to go into a tailspin that will match that of the city commission of Sarasota and possibly, soon the county board of Sarasota as well. Term limits and targeting of conscientious members who value the community over special interests are in play now and few voices will remain to object and point the way to better paths, reliance upon TBT will be even greater than before.
Posted by Charles Ivarch on November 11, 2012

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page

 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!

News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate


Name Date
Irene Brothers July 24, 2015
Allene O'Brien June 23, 2015
Dorothy Hill July 28 2015
David Maberry July 24, 2015
Juanita Floyd June 26, 2015
Elizabeth Bennett July 22, 2015
John Lawler July 21, 2015
Marilyn Doxey July 22, 2015
Donald Mills July 23, 2015
All Obituaries

Copyright © 2009 - 2015 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper |
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates