News Section: Opinion
Over-the-Top Would Understate Security at Last Week's RNC
Last week at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida, security was in full force. It would be safe to say a new Guinness World Record was set with the ratio of protesters to police. But what could have summoned this wall to wall overkill of strength on to the streets, and where did the information to do so come from? Could the Military Industrial Complex be moving into the business of home improvement?
We are certainly better-off being ready for trouble than not. Prepared, alert and in gear to the possibilities of harms-way, is good, but what was this $100 million dollar demonstration really all about?
|
One of two groups following the Paul supporters below photos by John Rehill |
|
|
I'll start out where Mitt Romney left off: "...preserve a military so strong no nation dare to test it." That was my exact thought the moment I popped out of the door at the parking garage my first day at the RNC. I figured this must be either a fashion show for military occupation gear, or a dress rehearsal for a new series called War In The City.
There were police in helicopters, SUVs, on bikes, segways, motorcycles and in boats. Police were on top of buildings, flying drones, on horseback and thousands upon thousands of boots on the ground. There was a 'dare to test' message for sure, coming from nearly every door way, on every corner and in half of the vehicles that drove by or sat on each corner.
Inside the Tampa Bay Times Forum there was another message: 'Keep government out of our lives.' But somewhere between the 30 miles of chain link fence, thousands of barricades, numerous checkpoints and soldiers armed with automatic weapons, I wondered whose lives they were referring to?
Someone on the street told me, "… this is what it will look like after the 1% win the class war." Nearly everyone I talked to was just speechless when I asked them about the wall to wall uniforms. One replied, "and they are not all in uniform."
Was the information and rumors of there being a revolutionary attack flawed, were the screams -- the sky is falling, the sky is falling and the disgruntled will rain havoc on us all -- a hoax?
I spoke to more than 100 police, and even more RNC participants, in the days I was there. It was reported that Tampa Police Chief Jane Castor said she was happy with the crowd's composure and a near complete absence of problems, but at what cost?
Castor said that the estimate for rabble-rousers has been overblown. What an understatement. Where did she get the information she banked this mountain of response on? The public needs to know. Did the information come from the federal government when they offered Tampa a $50 million security grant?
![]() |
| photo by Dale Ann Clancy |
Castor also says she accepts the criticism. But her duty calls for far more insight and intelligence gathering. The response offered was total overkill.
I spent the most of two days in the streets outside the security fences, and what happened there was nothing to be proud of. Every time that 20 or 25 of the Ron Paul supporters walked anywhere, they were draped by 50 to 100 police. I see where Romney got his "dare to test" line. What did those who had tickets to the event, and the brigade protecting them, think these American citizens were going to do?
I have been to many a protest in Washington D.C. and elsewhere, and many times there were one, two and even 300,000 passionate protesters. Never have I seen a force that comes close to what happened in Tampa at the RNC.
There were around 200 protesters in total, and 150 of them were Ron Paul supporters who were being labeled protesters, I guess because they didn't have a ticket into the convention. Those supporters were followed by police three times their number, no matter where they went. There were a few hundred more Paul supporters inside the Forum who occasionally announced themselves, but they never came out to join those in the street.
Regardless of what the network media said; citizens outside the compound were totally intimidated by the gross numbers of those in uniform. I often asked some of the police, what they thought about this overly portioned phenomena and each quickly justified it. One told me, "If you were in the Middle East, they'd shoot you for what you are doing." I had to remind him I was just a reporter and only trying to get a handle on what was happening.
I truly understand the precautionary rule, but what happened in Tampa was not even close. Nearly everyone I asked inside the convention as to their take on the brigade surrounding the event said, "better safe than sorry." Imagine if all of those who attended took home with them the same commitment to our children's education, what's in their lunches, climate change and our health care crisis.
![]() |
| photo by Dale Ann Clancy |
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Click here to add a comment to this page |















Enter Your Comment Below
Please note that all items must be completed for your comment to be submitted. We provide this service to our readers as a platform for intelligent and respectful debate. Our comments are moderated and comments must be approved before they become visible with any article. YOUR COMMENT WILL NOT BE INSTANTLY VISIBLE, so please do not leave duplicates of your comment. Comments are usually activated within a couple of hours and no more than one day.
Our comments are moderated. All comments must be approved before they become visible with any article. Comments are limited to 1000 characters. Please read our FAQ for full information.
Real, full names and email addresses only, NO HANDLES ALLOWED. Comments with foul language, personal attacks, vitriol or hate speech will not be posted ..
Entries with screen names, first initials, pseudonyms, or false email addresses will not be activated. Comments are limited to 1000 characters. Please read our FAQ for more information.