Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Will you be attending at least one of the five Marauders home games occurring July 17-23?

 Yes  No More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis

Home
Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Opinion



Understanding the Fast and Furious Scandal

Published Thursday, June 28, 2012 12:10 am

A House vote is scheduled for today on whether to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over an ATF gunwalking scandal, usually referred to by the name of its most significant operation, Fast and Furious. The complicated and controversial issue that centers around a highly-questionable policy that led to the death of at least one federal agent has a long history and multiple political ramifications. Here's a quick rundown of the issue itself, as well as things to look for as it continues to unfold.

 

Between 2006 and 2011, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations as part of Project Gunrunner, a Bush-era program designed to curb the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States. Gunwalking is a policy where monitored guns are allowed to be sold and transported, rather than intercepted in a sting, for the purpose of following their delivery to bigger fish.

In this case, suspicious orders, like a high volume of assault rifles, were reported as being made to licensed dealers by suspected straw buyers (someone making the purchase on behalf of someone else) who might be buying them to be smuggled into Mexico for use by drug cartels. The policy was controversial from the get-go, with several agents and dealers expressing concerns that the guns would be used to commit crimes, possibly even leading to the death of federal agents.

Firearms that were allowed to be sold by the ATF under this policy have been found at murder scenes on both sides of the Mexico/U.S. border, including one involving the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The "gunwalking" operations became public in the wake of Terry's murder. ATF whistleblowers came forward to Congress in response. Two months after Terry's death, Immigration and Customs Special Agent Jaime Zapata was ambushed and murdered while on assignment in Mexico. Weapons used in Zapata's murder were linked to suspects who had been under ATF surveillance for at least six months without being arrested.

As investigations have continued, the operations have become increasingly controversial. First, there's the matter of the policy itself, which seems to have originated in response to criticism that the ATF doesn't successfully reel in enough high-value targets. However, for obvious reasons, U.S. citizens, members of Congress and other officials have questioned the judgment of allowing such dangerous weapons to move freely.

The results yielded have been poor. In addition to the aforementioned deaths, the operations were unsuccessful in terms of catching up-the-ladder criminals. Operation Fast and Furious led to the sale of over 2,000 of these firearms, of which nearly 700 were recovered as of October 20, 2011, according to a report by CBS. A number of the so-called straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted, however, none of the targeted, higher-level cartel figures have been arrested.

ATF is overseen by the Justice Department, which is of course headed by Attorney General Eric Holder, who has consistently denied authorizing gunwalking operations, or knowing about the tactic's use while it was occurring. Holder asked the Justice Department Inspector General to investigate gunwalking in February 2010 and has testified in Congressional hearings on Operation Fast and Furious nine times.

In May of 2011, he told the Judiciary Committee, "I'm not sure of the exact date, but I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks." This has been the biggest source of controversy for him, because there are memos and emails addressed to the AG that date back to the previous July which mention the operation. Holder claims that he was answering when he first knew about the gunwalking policy of the operation, which is what he was being questioned about, and says he misunderstood the question if it was intended to ask when he'd first knew of the operation's existence otherwise.

There has been no proof offered so far that Holder knew about gunwalking while it was being used, but Holder and the Justice Department have not agreed to turn over all documents requested by House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa, hence the contempt vote, which will be further politicized by the NRA's claim that the operation was rooted in a desire to implement stricter gun control laws. The influential group has recommended to all House members that they vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt.

You might be wondering where the President fits in. Just before the first time a vote to hold the Attorney General in contempt was scheduled to be taken, President Obama invoked executive privilege for the first time during his presidency in order to prevent some of the requested documents from being released. Rep. Issa challenged the use of privilege, arguing that the measure is reserved for documents to and from the president and his most senior advisers, while President Obama's use broadly covers communications beyond that of himself and such qualified advisers.

Holder has testified that the White House knew nothing about the Fast and Furious operation's gunwalking, and had no one involved in the management of the operation, which either makes a case for privilege thin, or suggests that both have lied. Further complicating the issue for the President is that back in 2007, while he was a Senator running for the Democratic Presidential nomination, he criticized then-President Bush for invoking executive privilege over his administration's firing of several DOJ attorneys, even calling for then Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez's resignation, saying he was not the "people's attorney," but the "president's attorney." The appearance that White House staff may have leaked matters of national security to the press in order to bolster the President's national security image heading into an election also casts a big shadow on a seemingly thin case for withholding the requested documents for reasons ostensibly linked to protecting our national security interests.

When we get down to brass tacks, there are two issues here. One is the matter of whether gunwalking should be viewed as an unacceptable tactic, which all evidence seems to suggest is the case. The other, and the one at the root of today's vote, is whether getting to the bottom of who authorized it, and who knew what when, is being obstructed either by Attorney General Holder or the White House, and for political reasons rather than matters of national security.

After eight years of presidential lies and secrecy under the previous administration, a thirst for transparency certainly aided in President Obama's rise to power. Election year or not, he owes Americans, as well as the families of Mr. Terry and Mr. Zapata, more than his vague promise to look into things and make sure that people who made mistakes are "held accountable." His role in this matter is not to decide that, but to facilitate the body whose role it is; in this case the House Oversight Committee.

 

Dennis Maley is a featured columnist and editor for The Bradenton Times. His column appears every Thursday and Sunday on our site and in our free Weekly Recap and Sunday Edition (click here to subscribe). An archive of Dennis' columns is available here. He can be reached at dennis.maley@thebradentontimes.com. You can also follow Dennis on Facebook and Twitter by clicking the badges below.

 

Twitter Widgets
Dennis Maley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.

 

  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below



Non-Facebook Comments:


I think the most important aspect of the continuing quest for documents from the oversight committee is the withdrawl of the letter from Holder that DOJ (including Holder) had no knowledge of the Fast and Furious operation. That letter is considered testimony by Holder and that letter was withdrawn almost a year after it was submitted, admitting that it was in error. Frankly the oversight committee would have to be incompetent to not ask and search for the truth here. Holder, in all his appearences, has never answered the question as to why the denial of knowledge letter was withdrawn. I would think that every American should want to know the truth here. It is always the coverup that gets them in trouble, isn't it?
Posted by jim catalani on June 29, 2012
 

Dennis, Thanks for the analysis of the "Fast and Furious" mess. All the media attention on this has focused on Eric Holder and his deceptions and refusal to cooperate. In addition the MSM is taking its cues as usual from the Obama Administration which is attempting to portray this as a politically motivated witch-hunt run by the Republicans. When the media plays along with reporting only the he-said she-said finger pointing, most citizens just tune out. Blah Blah Blah.

What is not be asked is: What kind of reckless arrogance makes our leadership think that shoveling secret arms to terrorists (drug dealers are just terrorists for profit) in the country next door could ever be acceptable under ANY circumstance, no matter how well intended! Mexico has major corruption and violence problems and this is how we help? Really, it is unbelievable.And we wonder why countries around the world distrust and despise us. Can you imagine if we uncovered a program run by the Mexican government that was secretly providing high powered weapons to terrorists in the USA for years and years. Weapons that had killed thousands of US citizens. How would that go over around here? We would consider that an act of war. Who ever participated in this needs to be turned over to the Mexicans for prosecution. Bush era folks included.
Posted by Jim Hamilton on June 29, 2012
 

Holder is specifically witholding documents created *after* he claimed that he had no knowledge of the program a year and a half ago. The program under Bush used RFID chips to keep track of the weapons, and the program was halted when it was determined that the bad guys had become aware of the tracking.
Posted by Randy Venable on June 28, 2012
 

Hey Dennis, I agree that information leading to finding guilty parties needs to be out there. Seems no matter who's in office things happen that only a certain few are privy too, secrets are kept forever and underhanded events happen, in the name of our countries security. I can imagine every President has had to keep secrets to cover for such happenings and Pres. Obama is no exception, as well as most high ranking gov. officials. I figure that's another reason for Presidents to come and go and unlike kings, queens, dictators and the like are not bound by the rules we citizens have to abide by. I want to thank you for explaining to the masses how these official, "gunrunning", operations work. Bottom line is our gov folks do a lot of behind the scene, crazy dirty stuff in the name of Homeland security even before the official office of Homeland Security, ever was, and i,m sure many Presidents have been in the loop. thanks Dennis
Posted by Peter Ford on June 28, 2012
 

Get your fact's right Dennis. The program under the Obama administration was NOT part of the Bush era opperation's. It was a sepererate & new one created under the Obama administration. During the Bush time Mexico knew about it & participated in it. Not so under this administration. They were not the same program. Do more research before you write about anything next time, Please
Posted by Robert B Davis on June 28, 2012
 

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page




 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!



News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate
 

MidTown Manatee - Shop here - Work here - Play Here - Live Here - Worship Here - Dine Here

Obituaries

Name Date
Edith Norbury July 20, 2014
Richard McLaren July 17, 2014
Jean Burroughs July 18, 2014
Larry Van Winkle July 18, 2014
Eugenia Shannon July 15, 2014
Philip Hack May 28, 2014
Melvin White July 5, 2014
Judith Kissel July 8, 2014
Abbott Siplin July 19, 2014
All Obituaries






Copyright © 2009 - 2014 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper | http://www.thebradentontimes.com/
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates