Events Calendar

2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch

Eat Here - Gulf Coast Cookery Right column ad Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you think the labrador mix Padi, who bit and injured a child while the dog was allegedly protecting himself, should be euthanized?

 Yes  No More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Environment

DEP Enforcement Falls Sharply Under Scott's Reign

Published Friday, June 22, 2012 12:10 am

BRADENTON — Enforcement of anti-pollution laws in Florida has nose-dived during the first full year of Governor Rick Scott’s tenure, according to a report by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals committed to responsible management of America’s public resources.

The groups says that dramatic declines in the number of cases brought and amounts of fines levied across virtually every district and in all forms of pollution, appear to reflect directives that state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) staff should avoid pursuing enforcement whenever possible.

“These latest figures show significantly poorer performance in almost every major program in every district,” stated Florida PEER Director Jerry Phillips, a former DEP enforcement attorney, who conducted the analysis.  “Due to recent relaxations in pollution discharge permit standards, there is every reason to believe this downward trend will continue, if not accelerate.”

The DEP figures show that in 2011:

  • The total number of enforcement cases fell by more than a fourth (28%) and the DEP Office of General Counsel received the third lowest number of case reports in agency history


  • Pollution penalty assessments dipped by a similar proportion (29%) while penalties actually collected dropped by more than half (57%). The number of big fine cases (more than $100,000) also was cut by half


  • Enforcement actions with compliance follow-up (long-form consent orders) plummeted nearly two-thirds (62%) from 2010. Other enforcement orders sank to levels not seen since the mid-90s.

PEER says that such drastic and consistent drops in enforcement would seem to reflect a deliberate policy shift, rather than a statistical blip and point to a November 19, 2011 memo from the DEP second-in-command and Deputy Secretary for Regulatory Programs Jeff Littlejohn, that directs staff to refrain from taking enforcement action except as a last resort:

The memo read: “Where noncompliance occurs despite your best efforts at education and outreach, your first consideration should be whether you can bring about a return to compliance without enforcement.”

“There are several problems with this ‘enforcement last’ approach," Phillips said. "First, it rolls the dice on environmental protection. Second, there is no compensation for public resource damages, so it becomes a back-door taxpayer subsidy to polluters,” noting this ‘compliance first’ approach also entails that compliance be monitored, a dubious strategy given that declining penalty revenue reduces financial support for DEP programs, making monitoring even less feasible. “In fact, DEP has no idea whether they are actually achieving greater pollution compliance. To make matters worse, the Scott administration is taking a number of steps that make it even harder to track whether compliance is maintained over time.”
The extent of these problems was underlined in a new audit report from the DEP Inspector General, which found a breakdown in air pollution enforcement in the Southwest (Tampa) District so severe that it “may have damaged the reputation of the Department with the local regulated community and federal regulatory agency (EPA).”

“If regulated industries had a playbook for how to dismantle pollution controls, it could not have worked better than what has already taken place,” Phillips concluded.

PEER also has a pending legal complaint before the EPA to disqualify DEP Secretary Herschel Vinyard from all clean water permitting decisions due to prior industry ties, which violate federal conflict rules. The group has earned notoriety previously for winning the biggest public employee whistleblower lawsuit in history by forcing the restoration of U.S. Park Police Chief Teresa Chambers, and helping to defeat an effort by Coca Cola to kill a proposed plastic bottle ban at Grand Canyon National Park.

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.


  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below

Non-Facebook Comments:

I guess the Tea Party won't be happy until our government is totally controlled and operated by the greedy profiteers who care only about taking the resources of Florida for themselves. How can they be so ill-advised to not think that environmental laws are designed to protect all of us?
Perhaps we could next eliminate those pesky traffic cops who try to slow us down and improverish people by writing expensive tickets. Come to think of it, why have any laws? Get rid of all government and let's just do whatever the strongest and richest want to do!
Posted by James Buckley on July 30, 2012

If PEER is so concerned about DEP, perhaps they can explain why it was so wonderful that, back in the good old days, the same violation was "punished" or fined differently around the state. Why did the company in one part of the state not encounter the same fine as company located somewhere else?
Posted by Mike Knowles on July 10, 2012

The purpose of FDEP is to "protect" not "punish". It appears that these career bureaucrats feel that they are the environmental cops trying write as many tickets as possible. Perhaps its time for a career change for a few DEP employees.
Posted by JimMadison on June 28, 2012

A lot of people are in favor of Rick Scott's attack on the D.E.P.Yes I agree maybe some regulations may be extreme, but I would rather err on the side of the environment instead of profits. We all have to breathe the same air, drink the same water, so why screw it up for our children in the name of greed. Remember, once we pollute everything, it will cost us in the quality of life we have & try to advertise to tourists but will also cost us in eventual profits when corporations & people quit moving or visiting here. Maybe Rick Scott can afford to move elsewhere when things get too bad, but how about you?
Posted by William E.Moore on June 25, 2012

Since environmental laws have turned into an excuse to control legitimate commerce I think it is great that Scott is bringing DEP under control. Socialist have been using environmental laws to kill our economy and impoverish people for too long. Go Gov. Scott.
Posted by Rich Angley on June 24, 2012

Posted by Jack weber on June 24, 2012

So taking the word of PEER (extreme left wing group) is suppose to convince anybody that there's something wrong with stopping the runaway out-of-control Regulation happy EPA or the "old" DEP? I don't think so.
Thanks Gov Scott for the doing the right thing and curtailing the crazy Environmentalists.
Posted by Steve Vernon on June 24, 2012

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page

 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!

News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate


Name Date
Richard Shore, III July 29, 2015
Lisa Casper July 30, 2015
Nancy Rowe July 25, 2015
Irene Brothers July 24, 2015
Allene O'Brien June 23, 2015
Dorothy Hill July 28 2015
David Maberry July 24, 2015
Juanita Floyd June 26, 2015
Elizabeth Bennett July 22, 2015
All Obituaries

Copyright © 2009 - 2015 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper |
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates