Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


ELC - VPK Enrollment USa Dumpsters - Lowest Rates in Town Advanced Custom Countertops - Granite - Corian - Quarts - Doors - Resurface - and much more

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Who are you more likely to support in November?

 President Obama  Mitt Romney  Other  None of the Above More polls »

Gulf Coast Kendo - Training Uniforms Equipment

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Opinion



Letter to the Editor: Meeting Newt Gingrich

Published Saturday, January 28, 2012 2:00 am

I met Newt Gingrich in 1993 when he spoke at Bradenton Municipal Auditorium.  Never having heard of the man I went into that lecture prepared to hear a typical half-hearted prepared political speech. I left the auditorium a changed person: a "born again American".  I saw different kind of politician: a brilliant historian passionately in love with the United States. He explained that history has selected us to be participants in the greatest political experiment the world has ever known: to see if it is possible for human beings to govern themselves without a king or dictator to force his idea a Utopia on us. Newt urged us to read about the foundations of our Country and gave a list of readings for every American. I took his advice and as I studied I came to realize that the Constitution is to the Country what the Bible is to the Church: the basis upon which all else follows. I also began to devour everything Newt wrote and I too fell in love with this Country. I had the privilege of being a volunteer member of his task force on Medicare reform. I got to know his hopes and dreams for America.  My admiration was profound.
 
Then came the disappointing news that my hero had "feet of clay" with his extra-marital affair, divorce and resignation from Congress.  Disgusted and disillusioned I threw out the boxes of information I had accumulated labeled "Newt".  I stopped listening to him but he went right on trying to rescue the American Experiment.  I tried not to notice as he worked tirelessly with conservative think-tanks, wrote learned books and even fiction to get his message out to common folks. But I couldn't turn from his message. I noticed each time he turned down a run for president saying in effect "I prefer to be a private person.  I will read, study and do the homework for you guys so you candidates can carry the message to the American people."  He watched and hoped through several elections that someone would take up the message.  No one did so he finally decided to grit his teeth, endure the contempt that would be sure follow and attempt to do the job himself - much as his own hero George Washington did.
 
When political sages laid out their blueprint for winning the presidency Newt refused to follow saying he would not stoop to those tactics but would run an issues oriented campaign even if it meant losing.  They abandoned him and ever the best minds on FOX news declared his candidacy DOA.  Newt is a visionary and like all visionaries it is difficult to get the "blind" to share his vision.  He told me that our political opponents are not evil people but just uninformed of what America is all about. He urged me to use every opportunity to educate not argue with them.  I have tried to do that but at age 80 I am weary of fighting what seems to be a losing battle.  We are in a struggle for the soul of America. I sincerely urge you to study Newt's message, take it heart, spread it and give him a chance to bring this Country back to the founding principles that has make it the greatest nation in the history of mankind.  God bless America.
 
Antoinette "Toni" Parsons
Bradenton, Florida



Comments:


Great read Tony!

Here is something that the liberal has not told us about!!

Newt Gingrich has been cleared!!

Remember the uproar regarding Newt's "ethics violations?" People can refresh their memory by reading an article I wrote in 1997 about these charges. In brief, David Bonior brought 75 ethics charges against Newt, 74 which were found to have no merit whatsoever (and people say that Ken Starr is on a "witch hunt?"). The last charge, whether Newt funded his college class "Renewing American Civilization" properly, was too complicated a tax issue for the committee to investigate on its own, so they brought in an outside tax expert to investigate. Two charges arose out of this investigation.

The first 'charge' from the ethics committee is that he "may have" violated tax law by using tax-deductible contributions from nonprofit organizations to teach an allegedly partisan college course.

The second 'charge' from the committee is that, in the course of the investigation, Newt provided false information to the committee. And what was this "false information?" Newt testified that the above contributions were in fact made by those organizations to "Renewing American Civilization." He filed papers that stated the very same thing. This is never a fact that anyone was trying to hide. But one paper filed with the committee stated that those groups did not make the contributions. For this, there was an uproar about Newt's ethics, and he was fined.

Basically, Newt was fined $300,000 because he didn't read his lawyers' documents carefully. I could really get into the hypocrisy of this in light of the fact that people want to excuse Bill Clinton for lying under oath, (maybe if the course Newt had taught was about SEX the Democrats would feel differently) but that's not the point of this article.

Well, after a 3.5 year probe, after Newt paid the $300,000 fine, the IRS announced on February 3, 1999, that it found NO IMPROPRIETIES IN THE TAX FILINGS of Gingrich and the sponsoring Progress and Freedom Foundation. The IRS said the principles taught in the course were not of use only in political campaigns. "The ... course taught principles from American civilization that could be used by each American in everyday life whether the person is a welfare recipient, the head of a large corporation, or a politician."

Well isn't that nice - and isn't that what Newt had been saying all along?

In other words, the ethics charges David Bonior filed against Newt were ALL bogus. Every single one of them. In the end, what was Newt's "ethics problems"? One of the papers filed by his lawyers had an error and Newt didn't catch it. That little oversight cost $300,000.

Some might say "vindication is vindication" and Newt should just be tickled about this. . . but would YOU feel better if you've already lost $300,000 and your job in the process?

Where are the cries about how long and how much money was spent on this investigation? Where are all the news stories about this vindication? Granted, there have been some news stories but certainly not that many. Perhaps the news isn't quite as big when it's Newt who is the one in the right and his accusers are the ones in the wrong.

Now, if some people already see the irony of Newt being blasted for "lying to congress" because one of his lawyers' documents was in error while people argue that we should ignore that fact that Bill Clinton lied under oath, here's a little more irony for you.

Democrats have argued over and over again that even if Clinton DID lie in his deposition in Paula Jones' sexual harassment suit, it doesn't matter because the suit was eventually thrown out of court. Thus, any lies were "not material" and so not valid grounds for punishment, and certainly not impeachment. Well, the IRS has found that there were NO IMPROPRIETIES IN THE TAX FILINGS. Using the same rationale as Clinton's supporters, shouldn't Newt Gingrich be allowed to get his $300,000 back, since any misstatements he might have made are now "not material?"

David Bonior stated a couple of years ago that "Mr. Gingrich engaged in a pattern of tax fraud." Well, it now looks as if Bonior was way out in left field on all 75 of his accusations. How about a censure of David Bonior for filing 7 unfounded charges against him, so Newt can at least get his good name back? But how could I forget? We are in the age of forgiveness, where we just "forgive and forget" perjury and obstruction of justice, so I guess that means forgiving David Bonior too. Too bad people weren't as "forgiving" when it was Newt Gingrich in the hot seat.

This article copyright © 1999 by Carolyn Gargaro and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written consent of its author. All rights reserved.
Posted by Travis Cundiff on January 29, 2012
 

Click here to add a comment to this page


Site Search


Sign up for the
Weekly Recaps

Enter Your Email:

Menu

 
Manatee Rural Health Certificate

Obituaries

Name Date
Alton Oliver 05/17/2012
Henry Pearlberg 05/18/2012
Marjorie Trook 05/20/2012
H. Virginia Longfellow 05/16/2012
Henny Braam 5/18/2012
Anne Scharle 05/01/2012
Roscoe Corley 05/17/2012
Elwin Giguere 05/11/2012
George Garnett 05/11/2012
All Obituaries



Free xml sitemap generator