Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch


I Promise Ad Corn Hole Classic

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you think that when a drunk driver injures or kills a passenger who is also inebriated and willingly got into the car knowing the driver's state, it should be viewed the same as if they killed or injured a sober motorist or pedestrian who was not in their vehicle, in terms of their sentencing?

 Yes, either way their choice and action caused death or injury  No, they should still be punished but some of the responsibility lies with the person who chose to get in the car More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: State Government



Rep. Scott Randolph Applauds Legal Challenge of HJR 1471

Published Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:20 am

TALLAHASSEE – The Florida Education Association, the largest teachers' union in Florida, joined the American Civil Liberties Union and several rabbis and ministers seeking to halt a 2012 ballot measure they say falsely pushes to allow school vouchers in the name of religious freedom. The groups filed a lawsuit against the secretary of state Wednesday to prevent the measure.

 

Florida Republicans have put a constitutional amendment on the 2012 ballot they call the Religious Freedom Act. Proponents of the act consider it a way to contest religious injustice. However, challengers point out that the law would go against separation of church and state -- a concept first presented in the U.S. by founding-father Thomas Jefferson. They feel that passing the law would pave the way for non-taxpaying religious organizations to dip into public funds to finance their activities.

 

Rep. Scott Randolph (D-Orlando) applauded the lawsuit stating, “Throughout the 2011 legislative session, Republican legislators disguised the proposed constitutional amendment as one that would merely protect religious freedom and end religious discrimination. But in actuality, this proposal has one purpose: to allow the unlimited use of taxpayers’ money to send children to private schools instead of building a quality public school system.”

 

The act would delete from the Florida Constitution the clause that forbids the government from giving money directly or indirectly to religious institutions.

 

“Unfortunately, the proponents of this legislation have shrouded their support for vouchers under a bogus argument of religious protection. Such tactics are shameful, and I only hope the court sees through their charade and strikes from the ballot this defenseless attempt to trick voters,” said Randolph.

 

However, many residents feel they could benefit from the proposed amendment. Private, faith-based organizations can often provide valuable services for less money than the public sector, therefore lowering government costs for taxpayers. However, current constitutional language prohibits the state from tapping into these potential resources, according to a Florida Senate release.

 

“Florida’s Constitution should not require discrimination against religious institutions simply because we (or “they”) are religious. Floridians deserve the opportunity to benefit from programs with a secular purpose run by religious entities. Hospitals caring for Medicaid beneficiaries, schools educating children from failing schools with vouchers that save the state money and may offer a better education, and other service providers that comply with all the established requirements should be allowed to serve,” said Archbishop Thomas Wensk.

 

Many Florida bishops praised the local senate for passing the bill that would protect religious organizations who claim they are unfairly being denied government funding on the basis of faith discrimination. The bill was approved by state senators on May 6, 2011.

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.

 

  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below



Non-Facebook Comments:


It is incorrect to suggest that Thomas Jefferson "first presented" the idea of separation of church and state. Even in 18th century Virginia, evangelicals insisted upon separation of church and state both to protect the state AND the church. See Wellspring of Liberty. While it may sometimes make sense for religiously-based institutions to have non-discriminatory access to government funds (e.g. hospitals), that is a far cry from school vouchers, a situation in which religious schools almost always get over 90% of the benefit -- this is disguised efforts to use public funds to promote Catholic and other religious education. I am all in favor of private, religious education, but the 18th century evangelicals would insist that prayer (and religious education) not be polluted by government support.
Posted by John Ragosta on July 23, 2011
 

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page




 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!



News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate
 

Warehouse for Rent

Obituaries

Name Date
Virginia Goodhew April 11, 2014
Dorothy Hackett April 9, 2014
Margaret Nelson April 9, 2014
Robert McNally April 2, 2014
James Hibbs April 4, 2014
Marvin Prager April 7, 2014
David Marsh April 4, 2014
Cheryl Edgington March 29, 2014
Rowland Shannon April 2, 2014
All Obituaries






Copyright © 2009 - 2014 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper | http://www.thebradentontimes.com/
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates