Events Calendar

Current Weather

Manatee Road Watch

Eat Here - Gulf Coast Cookery Sean Tampa Bay yacht Management Bills Discount Center - New & used Furnature, Appliances and More!

The Bradenton Times Polls

Poll Question: Do you plan on visiting Cuba if Congress eases travel restrictions?

 Yes  No More polls »

The Robyn Report with Robyn Davis Right column ad

Change Text Size: Larger  Smaller

News Section: Opinion

Do Members of Congress Really Get a Full Pay Pension After Just One Term?

Published Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:08 am

Instant full-pay pensions, Cadillac benefit plans, no Social Security enrollment – there are a lot of rumors floating around the web as to perks lavished on members of Congress. First let's address the pension misconception. Members of Congress elected after 1984 are covered by the Federal Employees Retirement System. They are fully vested once they've served 5 years, but that doesn't mean they get “full pay.”

Their “full retirement” is based on a number of factors including length of service, as well as options that they select when enrolling. They must be 62 before they can begin receiving the benefits, 50 if they've served 20 years and benefits can be received at any time after retirement, regardless of age once they've served 25 years. The typical pension range is between $35-60,000 and by law cannot exceed 80 percent of whatever their pay was at the time they retired. Serving the minimum five years will only secure an annual pension of around $15,000 once the retiree reaches 62.

Not that that's anything to sneeze at. Military service members have to serve a full 20 years to get a dime of retirement pay and even then it's only 40 percent of their base pay (about a quarter of what they typically earned in service). The Congressional pension benefit also has automatic cost-of-living adjustments, which only 1 in 10 private sector retirements feature. Like other federal employees, members of Congress only have to contribute 1.3 percent of their salary to FERS. Also, as federal employees, they can contribute up to 10 percent of their pay (with a 5 percent match) to what amounts to a sweet 401k plan.

Perhaps the most egregious part of the Congressional pension is the fact that even criminals get to keep it. Whereas many public sector retirements can be lost for certain offenses, a federal pension can only be revoked if that employee is found guilty of treason, perjury or trading secrets with the enemy! When Democratic Congressman James Traficant was convicted of bribery and a host of other related charges in the early 1980's, he was evicted from Congress, but allowed to keep his pension. A bill to prevent expelled members from collecting their pension benefit was proposed, stalled and then dropped in committee.

When Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham admitted to taking millions in bribes from defense contractors in 2005, and was also allowed to keep his pension, another law sought to expand the revocation to include bribery of public officials or witnesses, conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States, perjury while denying the commission of bribery or conspiracy, or subornation of perjury committed in connection with false denial or false testimony of another individual. Congress has proven equally reluctant to police themselves this time around. The bill, originally introduced by Senator John Kerry in 2006, passed the Senate 87-0 before quietly dying in committee the way bills that politicians don't want to be caught voting against, yet don't want to pass, often have a way of doing. It's been reintroduced several times since, including this year, but still remains in legislative Purgatory where it is expected to meet the same fate once more.


Social Security

Yes, all members of Congress do pay into Social Security and are eligible to receive benefits (though they are offset against their federal pension benefit), despite persistent Internet rumors and urban myths stating otherwise. The confusion is related to the Civil Service Retirement System that covered many federal employees from its inception in 1920 and ran parallel to Social Security until 1984. In January of 1984, all members of Congress, the President and Vice President, Federal judges, etc. were moved over to Social Security and have been there since. There are still a small number of federal employees, hired before 1984, that are not enrolled in Social Security, but none are members of Congress.


Health Care

While health care is not free, it is pretty plush. There are a variety of PPO and HMO health care plans available to Congress and their families, as well as other federal employees. The government's contribution is the lesser of 1.) 72 percent of the overall weighted average, or 2.) 75 percent of the total individual or family premium for the plan they select. There are options for health, vision, dental, life, long term care, etc. Like the retirement plan, it is generally much better than what the vast majority of Americans in the private sector get, where increasingly, employers have reduced their contribution percentage, especially for family members enrolled in an employee's plan.

While health insurance for Congress is not totally free and is available to other federal employees, House and Senate members are uniquely eligible to receive care at military hospitals. For outpatient procedures, there is no charge at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) in nearby Bethesda, MD. They can also visit the Office of the Attending Physician of the U.S. Capitol for certain outpatient services (with referral to WRNMMC for inpatient), if they pay a modest annual fee of around $500.



Then there's the pay, which in 2011 is $174,000 for rank and file, $193,400 for Majority and Minority Party Leaders in both chambers, and $223,500 for Speaker of the House. That's up from $98,400 in 1990 and there's a good reason. Since 1989, salaries have been set to an automatic annual increase in order to spare them the politically awkward effort of voting themselves more pay hikes, especially in times like this when their approval rating is at historic lows and they're busy cutting payments to anyone else. They can vote to block the scheduled jump, which they did in 2010 and 2011, after a healthy raise during the financial crisis of 2009 sparked public outcry. Don't feel too bad though, 46 percent of Congressional members are millionaires (perhaps why they're so averse to taxing them), as opposed to 1 percent of the general population. And that's before they use the connections they've made in Washington to pull down big bucks in the private sector for industries they've overseen (perhaps favorably) while in office, once they leave.



There are other minor perks like a heavily-subsidized membership to their own private health club, free parking on Capitol Hill and at the airports, lavish offices with budgets to cover art and fine furnishings (they can even borrow some pieces from the Smithsonian!) and of course the special interest-sponsored golf trips to Scotland and other 5-star international travel junkets that they routinely take for free, like the ones that 81 House members took to Israel over this past summer. Plus, they seem to gain tremendous insight into market forces while on the hill. Either that or they trade on the inside information they gain, which isn't exactly illegal for them either (perhaps the best perk), leading to returns that are significantly larger than average investors. So, while members of Congress don't actually enjoy most of the mythical spoils that they're often ascribed, it's clearly safe to say that they've still got it sweeter than the vast majority of their constituents.

*It's worth noting that Congressman Ron Paul has never participated in the Congressional retirement plan, describing it as “immoral.” Paul is one of the 46 percent in the millionaires' club, with a disclosed net worth of between two and a half and five million dollars, which ranks him 77th in the U.S. House.


Editor's note: In response to public outcry, Congrees passed the STOCK Act in 2012 to address members trading on inside information, but then made it all but impossible to enforce the next year.



When it Comes to Investments, Why Can't We Be as Shrewd as Our Congressman?


Dennis Maley is a featured columnist and editor for The Bradenton Times. An archive of his columns is available here. He can be reached at

Join the conversation post Facebook comments here or on our site at the bottom of article.


  In Addition to Facebook Comments You Can Also Post Comments Below

Non-Facebook Comments:

Can any federal employee recieve a pension from more than one job?
Posted by Gordon Thompson on August 25, 2014

What about Supreme Court justices???? You seem to have left them out of this little investigation you did!!!

Retiring U.S. Supreme Court justices are entitled to a lifetime pension equal to their highest full salary. In order to qualify for a full pension, retiring justices must have served for a minimum of 10 years provided the sum of the justice's age and years of Supreme Court service totals 80.

As of 2010, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court earned an annual salary of $213,900, while the Chief Justice is paid $223,500.
Posted by Carol Thonen on July 25, 2012

To think of all the young men and women who are fighting and dying everyday so that these politicians can receive their high pay and perks is a slap in the face of the American people. We taxpayers should be ashame of ourselves for letting them get away with this. This is "greed" and corruption at the highest level.
Posted by Don Cochran on June 22, 2012

NO elected official should get retirement pay. Serve a term or two, or even make it a lifetime. If they want retirement, get a real job. They PAID to get elected... they should not get paid past the term they paid to get elected to.
Posted by Daniel Smith on October 7, 2011

@Christina Turley, so you believe that because the president wants to make it fair for all people he is a socialist, you have a few screws lose. What have the Republicans that were elected last Nov. done for this country but say NO to everything. And, by the way it's Herman Cain NOT Hentry Cain! Listen to H. Cain he believe that "if you don't have a job and you are not rich you should blame yourself!" What an idiot!!!
Posted by Linda Brundage on October 6, 2011

I think it is hilarious how you chose to highlight a Republican example of criminal activity. Let me guess...are you a Republican???
Posted by Harry Barber on October 6, 2011

Congress has always been good at protecting their own benefits even in a depression when they are trying to cut somebody else.As far as automatic pay increases it wouldn't be so bad if they would quit denying seniors on social security the same consideration they give themselves every year.As far as congress being allies with the president in fighting to save this nation as suggested by Mr. Shea,I would be happy if they would just compromise on a lot of issues instead of just the one sided approach we have now in the house of representatives when it comes to cutting the deficit.Oh well 2012 is not that far away,if congress will not change maybe the voters can change them.
Posted by William E.Moore on October 6, 2011

Please explain to me what this President as done to save this Nation.
Making it a socialist country,and very communistic is not the way to save a country,You should be listening to Hentry Cain
Posted by Christina Turley on October 6, 2011

Terrific work, Dennis! Not only does it put to rest a lot of very divisive and false Internet rumors (although what about the one that Congressional staffers don't have to pay their tuition loans back? That's the latest lie), but you have given us a clear picture of what needs to be accomplished, such as passing the Kerry bill and cutting the automatic increases. A recent CBS News poll reported that just 11% of Americans approve of the work of this Congress, and I think that's mostly because all they do is say "No!" They need to become constructive allies of the President in fighting to save this nation, its economy and its future. I am already mailing your article around.
Posted by Joe Shea on October 6, 2011

Click here to add a Non-Facebook comment to this page

 Sign up for our free news subscription - a great way to stay informed!

News World Round UpSports Roundup

Manatee Rural Health Certificate


Name Date
Juanita Floyd June 26, 2015
Elizabeth Bennett July 22, 2015
John Lawler July 21, 2015
Marilyn Doxey July 22, 2015
Donald Mills July 23, 2015
Allene O'Brien July 23, 2015
Irene Brothers July 24, 2015
Helen Mitchell July 23, 2015
Elizabeth Bennett July 22, 2015
All Obituaries

Copyright © 2009 - 2015 | The Bradenton Times | More than just an Online Newspaper |
405 26 Avenue Bradenton, FL 34205
Phone: 941-896-7857 - Privacy Policy - RSS Feed
Template provided by Free CSS Templates